The globalization that characterizes the contemporary world is provoking significant changes occurring at an accelerated rate. Economic integration schemes in the American continent, arising from the regional and bilateral free trade agreements and the policies of the International Financial Institutions (IFIs), have brought with them processes of social exclusion and polarization. However, their effects have not been homogenous and acquire distinct depths, forms and meanings according to the contexts in which they are inserted. The American continent is a mosaic of cultures and races, indigenous peoples and African descendents, and economic, social and ecological realities, in which globalization takes on specific traits. This diversity is also expressed in gender relations, which are a fundamental component of the economic and social organization of the region's nations and peoples.
The changes which have occurred in the lives of women and men over the past twenty years are not the simple result of the free market economy. The decade of the 1990s and these first years of the new century have also been marked by social mobilization to defend the exercise of integral human rights: economic, social, labor, cultural and environmental, as well as political and civil rights, as the standard and framework which should guide development strategies. The social mobilization of female workers and campesinas, and indigenous and urban-popular women, together with the feminist movement, have achieved the placement of a broad range of proposals for the advancement of gender equity in the national and international political agendas.
The proposals to achieve social and gender equity are often built against the tide of growing inequalities characterizing the globalized world. The concentration of wealth and power, exacerbation of both public and private violence, imposition of cultural models promoting consumerism and aimed at standardizing lifestyles, increasing poverty, deterioration of natural resources and sustainable forms of production, and prevalence of discrimination (for motives of gender, race, age, sexual orientation, or indigenous or African- American ethnicity), coexist with the conviction of broad population sectors that "another America is possible." This obligates us to identify the effects of the neoliberal model which are common for all women and men, while also analyzing the specific forms acquired by gender inequities and building alternatives to eradicate them.
The negative balances that characterized the so-called "lost decade" work in detriment to the possibilities of greater empowerment and autonomy for women incorporating within the worst segments of the labor market. Their incorporation not only has not relieved their housework burden, but that work has actually increased due to the shrinking of the State.
The structural adjustment policies of the 1980s and early 1990s paved the way for negotiation, signature and instrumentation of the free trade agreements and the intensification of foreign investments associated with those agreements. The adjustment programs were oriented to promote structural transformations in economies, including redefinition of the State role, modification of legal frameworks in particular in reference to the regulation and control of strategic resources, and reorientation of production in developing countries toward the export sector. More concretely, the adjustment programs meant drastic reductions in price subsidies, especially of agricultural products and basic services, and a strong drop in public investments in infrastructure, education and health.
A greater proportion of the social costs of reproduction and maintenance of the workforce were transferred to the "private" sphere, with the consequence that the economic and social value of this contribution has become even more invisible. Women, who traditionally - and still - are responsible for a large part of social reproduction,1 saw their labor burdens increase to replace a State which reduced and limited its functions. Women absorbed the impact of structural adjustment by working longer and harder both in and outside the home.
Latin America and the Caribbean grew from 620 billion dollars in 1995 to 752 billion in 2003. By that year, Brazil's debt reached 235 billion dollars, followed by Mexico with 149 billion and Argentina with 145 billion (CEPAL, 2004).
The beginning of the 1990s was accompanied by the initiation of negotiations of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA), the first such agreement of the continent, which has been followed by several others within the same scheme. The promises of economic growth which would External debt in translate into better levels of social well-being, not only have not been fulfilled, but the negative effects of these agreements have been added to old problems such as the enormous external debt burden -in some countries transformed into or accompanied by heavy internal debt- with the exacerbation of the economic dependence of the majority of, if not all, Latin American and Caribbean countries. The populations of the United States and Canada have not enjoyed improvements from the free trade agreements either. More than 37 million people in the world's wealthiest country are officially classified as poor and this figure increases year after year. The well-paid jobs for low-qualified operators in heavy industry, which once elevated the level of the United States middle class, have virtually disappeared and continue to do so. Since 2001, the United States has lost more than 2.7 million jobs in the manufacturing sector (Reuter Noticias, 2005).
Female labor participation went from 39% in 1990 to 44.7% in 1998 with an annual increase of almost 5%, while that of men during the same period remained stable at levels around 75% (ILO, 2005). In Canada and the United States, female economic participation rates are higher, at 57. 5% and 59.2% respectively in 2004 (ILO, 2004).
Urban informal employment in Latin America and the Caribbean increased from 42.8% to 46.7% in 2003. By that year, female informal employment was 50.1%, while that of men reached 44.1%.
One of the most important changes in women's participation in the economy is produced in this economic context: their massive and accelerated integration into the labor market, both formal and informal, and in both the urban and rural spheres.
This intensification of women's integration to the labor market is combined with the increase of women's access to distinct levels of education and other advancements achieved in this period. Nevertheless, the advantages of obtaining their own incomes are limited or in fact reverted by the quality of the jobs generated, characterized by their precarious and informal status. The labor flexibility implanted by the new production schemes make women's integration into the workforce possible, but in frankly exploitative conditions. Low wages, poorly-paid piecework or work out of the home, extra long workdays, and job instability and rotation, are some of the characteristics of a female labor force which is flexible and inclined to accept conditions which allow it to combine housework with that carried out outside the home. These conditions are repeated in micro-industries and are accentuated in the exportoriented'maquiladora assembly-line manufacturing industry, which for many years was the primary source of formal employment for women in various countries, especially in Central America and Mexico.
Women's incomes are 75% lower than those of men. This percentage improves in the case of more highly educated women (Grynspan, 2003).
Furthermore, women continue to obtain wages inferior to those paid to men, and they are employed in traditionally female branches and sectors (Birgin, 2001). At the same time, education, health, and social security services are in abject deterioration, or access to them has been significantly restricted, as in the reforms to the pension and retirement systems. This decline in social services is added to the attempts to privatize health, education, water, and other services to leave them subject to the free play of the market like any other "merchandise."
More than 200 million people were poor in 1990 (48.3%), and according to CEPAL estimates this number reached 225 million in 2003 (43.9%) (CEPAL, 2003).
Concentration of wealth and expansion of poverty have been the signs accompanying world-scale encroachment of the neoliberal model. Inequalities have been accentuated in our continent, considered the region with the greatest social disparities in the world. Poverty reaches its greatest proportions in rural areas, especially those inhabited by indigenous and Afro-mestizo populations. The urban poverty, including that present in the developed countries of North America, is also worrisome. There are more poor women than men, including a greater proportion of impoverished households headed by women.
Levels of exchange and trade dependency of Latin American and Caribbean countries in relation with the United States. Percentage of total exports whose destination is the United States: Mexico, Haiti and Honduras: More than 50% Costa Rica, Venezuela, Colombia and the majority of the members of the Central American Common Market and the Caribbean Community: Between 25 and 50% The countries of MERCOSUR, Chile, Panama and Peru: Less than 25%. Fuente: Red Internacional de Género y Comercio. 2003.
Three out of ten persons in Latin America and the Caribbean live in rural areas and depend on agriculture, fishing, livestock, forestry, tourism, and other activities for their subsistence. The rules established for the free trade agreements, such as NAFTA and other bilateral agreements, have wrought havoc in the lives of women and men in the countryside, who have faced an accelerated increase in imported agricultural products and the opening of borders to the large agro-industrial and agro-trade companies. In the rural regions, it is common to find a dynamic agro-industrial sector linked to export crops, controlled by large national and transnational capitals, and a severely straggling traditional sector, resulting in lost food security. The intensification of female participation in field work and other rural tasks obeys a family poverty-relief strategy and the decrease of agricultural and fishing incomes. Some calculations indicate that the women of the continent contribute close to 40% of food production and their contribution to poverty alleviation is significant. Micro-enterprises and self-employment contribute continuously more income sources, especially for poor women. However, the small projects have low possibilities for success because local, national and international markets are dominated by the giants who control the agro-food sectors, against which it is impossible to compete.
Women's right to land ownership, loan access, water source concessions, biodiversity, and access to other natural resources, lag far behind the rhythm of women's contribution to the rural economy. Programs promoting joint property titles to family land, so that ownership be officially shared by women and men, face legal, political and cultural obstacles that redound in a lack of economic and social recognition of women's productive role. That role, and women's traditional backyard activities and household work, are not taken into consideration in allocation of land ownership titles or usufructuary rights to water, forests and other resources. On the other hand, the rules imposed by the free trade agreements on intellectual property rights open the doors for transnational companies to patent and appropriate the genetic resources and traditional knowledge of the indigenous communities.
Some 25 million Latin American and Caribbean adults live outside their countries of origin. Two out of three of these regularly send money to their families (IDB, 2005).
Migration is an escape valve amidst the decline of the agricultural sector that combines with the sustained demand for cheap and flexible labor in the United States. The flow of Latin American and Caribbean male and female workers to that country grows and maintains itself, despite reinforced security and bordercontrol measures implemented in recent years. The money sent by Latin American and Caribbean migrants to their communities of origin reached 45.8 billion dollars in 2004 (IDB, 2005) and constitutes an important proportion of the national foreign exchanges and economies in El Salvador, Mexico, the Dominican Republic, and other countries. The proportion of men who immigrate -especially without legal documents- continues to be higher than that of women, but many young women and even entire families move internally to work in the maquila industry, as export-crop agricultural field hands, or as domestic workers. The figures indicate that gender discrimination factors are reproduced in jobs occupied by Latin American and Caribbean female migrants in the United States (Gammage, 2004) who occupy the lowest-paid jobs, together with children. Employment conditions are also disadvantaged for women in agro-industrial companies in their countries of origin. The difficulties encountered for the return of male migrants often result in abandonment of their homes of origin, contributing to increase the number of rural homes headed by women who are forced to assume the responsibility to sustain their families in very precarious conditions.
The growing military presence, as an act of domination over our peoples, has contributed to the sexual abuse of women, girls and boys, and to increased incidence of prostitution and violence. Along the borders, trafficking of persons has intensified, with specific dangerous consequences for women. In our America, feminicides increased following the establishment of neoliberal policies and with the tolerance of our governments. The State of Law in our countries is limited to the discourse, because the reality is characterized by impunity and lack of security in our homes, on the streets, and in women's lives in general.
It is clear that the current continental economic integration scheme is disadvantaged for women and does not contribute to reduce social and gender inequities. Alternatives must urgently be promoted which effectively lead toward profound cultural changes to eliminate the discrimination of women and contribute to the construction of a more dignified and equitable society.
To advance toward economic integration schemes which are inclusive, democratic, and respectful of the social and cultural diversity of the countries of the Americas, guiding principles must be adopted to constitute a frame of reference for analysis, proposals, and action toward a new globalization. Some of the guiding principles oriented to diminish and eliminate the gender asymmetries are:
The guiding principles toward a new model of relations among the countries of the continent must be accompanied by objectives which foster the generation of social mobilization capable of opening opportunities and spaces for society's participation -including women and men- in the design of the international trade agreements and treaties as well as the national public policies which sustain them. The objectives enunciated below outline the action program of the Women's Committee of the Continental Social Alliance:2
1. Social reproduction refers to the whole of activities, generally carried out in the home, which allow human beings to satisfy their daily needs such as food preparation, cleaning, healthcare, childcare, and care of the elderly.
2. These objectives have been adopted from various documents of the member organizations of the Women's Committee of the Continental Social Alliance.
Women's Committee
Women's Committee Coordination of Hemispheric Social Alliance (HSA)/The Mexican Action Network on Free Trade (RMALC), Hilda Salazar Ramírez, María Atilano, Leonor Aída Concha, Rebeca Salazar, Silvia Sandoval.
Hilda Salazar Ramírez
Nalu Faria, Red Latinoamericana de Mujeres Transformando la Economía (REMTE), Brazil; Karen Hansen-Kuhn, Alliance for Responsible Trade, United States;
Norma Maldonado, Mesa Global, Guatemala; Norma Sanchis, International Gender and Trade Network (IGTN), Latin American chapter focal point, Argentina;
Alexandra Spieldoch, Center of Concern/ International Gender and Trade Network, United States;
Tania Vanegas, Alexander von Humboldt Center.
In Mexico:
Centro de Apoyo a la Mujer Margarita Magón, A.C.; Comité de Mujeres del Sindicato de Trabajadores de la Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México (STUNAM); Frente Auténtico del Trabajo (FAT); Marcha Mundial de la Mujeres en México (MMM); Mujer y Medio Ambiente, A.C.; Mujeres en Acción Sindical (MAS); Red Nacional de Género y Economía (REDGE); Sección XXXV del Instituto Mexicano del Seguro Social; Unión Campesina Democrática, A.C.
María Atilano
Gabriela Sánchez
We would like to thank the Heinrich Böll Foundation for its support for the realization of this publication.
Selected Bibliography: Works Cited and Consulted
Arroyo P., Alberto (2001). Resultados del Tratado de Libre Comercio de América del Norte en México. Lecciones para la negociación del Acuerdo de Libre Comercio de las Américas. RMALC, Mexico.
Birgin, Haydeé and Pautáis, Laura (2001). "¿Género en la reforma o reforma sin género?. Desprotección social en las leyes provisionales de América Latina". Serie Mujer y Desarrollo No. 36."Unidad de la Mujer y Desarrollo CEPAL, United Nations Publications, Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL (2000). El desafío de la equidad de género y de los derechos humanos en los albores del Siglo XXI. Serie Mujer y Desarrollo, Unidad Mujer y Desarrollo. United Nations, Santiago de Chile.
CEPAL (2002). Panorama Social de América Latina 2000-2001 (LC/g.2138-P/E), Santiago de Chile, United Nations, September, 2001, cited by Grynspan, Rebeca, 2003.
CEPAL (2004). Estudio Económico de América Latina y El Caribe 2003- 2004, September, www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/DesarrolloEconomico/5/ LCG255pe/lcg2255-ere.pdf.
Cuadernos Feministas (2003). "Comercio y Globalización. Las mujeres nos rebelamos contra el ALCA", "Las mujeres mexicanas ante la V Reunión Ministerial de la OMC", "Declaración dirigida a las Redes de Mujeres de América Latina" in Cuadernos Feministas Número 23, July-September, Mexico, 2003.
Comité de Mujeres de la Alianza Social Continental. ¡Mujeres contra el ALCA! Electronic newsletter, www.comitemujeresasc.org
Deere, D.C. and León, M. (2001) "¿De quién es la tierra. Género y programas de titulación de tierras en América Latina". Humanitás Portal temático en Humanidades. Cuadernos de Cendes/ Año 18, No. 48. Segunda Época, Caracas, September 2001.
ECLAC (2002-2003). Poverty and inequity from a gender perspective. Social Panorama of Latin America 2002-2003 (LC/G.2209-P), United Nations, Offprint.
ECLAC (2004). Roads towards gender equity in Latin America and the Caribbean. 9th Regional Conference on Women in Latin America and The Caribbean. Mexico City, 10-12 June 2004. United Nations.
FAO (1999). El acceso de la mujer latinoamericana a la Tierra. United Nations Food and Agriculture Organization, Rome.
Gammage, S and Schmitt, J. (2004). Los inmigrantes mexicanos, salvadoreños y dominicanos en el mercado laboral estadounidense: las brechas de género en los años 1990 y 2000. Serie Estudios y Perspectivas, Unidad de Desarrollo Social, CEPAL, United Nations Publications, Mexico.
Grynspan, Rebecca (2003). "Tendencias económicas y sociales en Latinoamérica: hacia una agenda desde la perspectiva de género" en Paloma de Villota (ed.) Economía y Género, política fiscal y liberalización. Análisis de su impacto sobre las Mujeres. Icaria Editores, Barcelona, 2003.
Mesa de Trabajo Mujeres y Economía (2004). ¿Porqué las mujeres nos oponemos al TLC? 10 razones desde las mujeres colombianas. Pamphlet sponsored by the REMTE, Bogotá, Colombia.
Ocampo, José Antonio. Panorama Social de América Latina 2002-2003. CEPAL, www.eclac.cl/publicaciones/DesarrolloEconomico/presentaciónPS2002- 2003_F1.pdf.
OIT (2004). Panorama Laboral 2004. América Latina y El Caribe, Lima, Perú, www.oit.org.pe/portal/documentos/panorama_laboral_2004.pdf.
International Gender and Trade Network (2003). Comercio y género: El ALCA y las otras alternativas de integración americana. Latin American chapter, Buenos Aires, Argentina.
International Gender and Trade Network (2003). "A Gender Perspective on the Multilateral Investment Agreement; Updates and Announcements.""Monthly Bulletin, Vol. 3 No. 3. www.igtn.org/Bulletins/Bulletins.htlm
Sirven, Martin (2004). El empleo rural no agrícola y la diversidad rural en América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL 83.